Info
Alle Bewertungen (1.544)
loothive (469900)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letzte 6 Monate
Bestätigter Kauf
Fast smooth transaction Great communication looking forward to future deals
samapease (338)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letzte 6 Monate
Bestätigter Kauf
Quick payment, great communication. Enjoy
maksantiques.ua (407)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letzte 6 Monate
Bestätigter Kauf
Good buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
jensand-3 (44)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letztes Jahr
Bestätigter Kauf
Quick and smooth transaction. Like melting Butter. A++
leslieraejones2012 (2604)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letztes Jahr
Bestätigter Kauf
Great folks to deal with, thank you!!
igotapickel (3660)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Vor über einem Jahr
Bestätigter Kauf
Another excellent eBay transaction! Thanks
Rezensionen (6)
14. Aug 2012
Great value for the money.
I'm using this four-thirds lens on a micro four thirds camera (the Olympus E-P1) using a chinese JY-43F adapter. The lens generally works well for me. Picture quality is good but unremarkable. Pictures are neither so awesome that I dance, nor so bad that I weep.
However, compared to the Panasonic Lumix H-FS014042 14-42mm (which I also have) in M4/3, the auto-focus on this one is slow and uncertain. With this Zuiko 40-150mm, the auto-focus tends to overshoot and then "seek" back and forth. The Lumix 14-42mm focuses quickly and reliably.
This auto-focus wonkiness is not enough of a problem for me to leave the lens out of my bag, and at home altogether. But it's enough of a problem to make me think twice about when to use it. Maybe on an four thirds camera, this would not be a problem. Or maybe if I used the official Pana or Oly adapter, instead of the chinese knockoff, this wouldn't be a problem. But I suspect it's the lens itself.
Mostly I use old manual focus (Canon FD, Nikon F, Konica AR) lenses on the E-P1, and it's actually faster to focus manually with some of these than with this particular lens.
Let's be clear. I paid less about $80 US for my instance, and a new lens in this range three times the price on either amazon or ebay. So at the price, some compromise is to be expected.
14. Aug 2012
Heavy, but compact. Typical manual focus zoom of the era.
2 von 3 finden das hilfreich This is a typical manual focus lens of the era. It's a bit unusual in that 65mm at the low end is rare, since most were 70, 75 or 80 at the low end.
Macro focusing works well.
These days, most people are using old manual focus lenses on a mirrorless digital camera. Olympus branded OM and PenF manual focus lenses command an unnatural price premium beyond their actual value. Unless you actually have a fetish for the Olympus brand, or actually need an OM lens to put on an old OM film camera, there are better choices. My recommendation would be the Nikkor 80-200 f4 or 80-200 f4.5, both of which are less expensive and are the sharpest zooms of this era. On the third hand, why are you using an ancient manual focus zoom instead of primes?
05. Jun 2012
Great lens, great price, perhaps the smallest micro 4/3 lens you can mount.
There's not much to say, other than this simply gets the job done without much fuss or excitement. It's an eeensy weensy teensy (that's "technical" for small) lens. Great image quality. Full automation. I mounted this on an Olympus E-P1 which I had primarily purchased for use with legacy glass, just to have a full-automation lens. Panasonic usually puts Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the lens, but not this one in order to make it small and light. That doesn't bother me at all because Olympus puts OIS in the body. While I still do most of my shooting with legacy lenses, it's convenient to put this on and just "take snapshots" when I don't want to work hard. This particular instance that I got cost only $170, making it a great bargain, and had been unbundled from a Panasonic body+lens kit.