Info
Alle Bewertungen (655)
firststopwholesale (872794)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letzter Monat
Bestätigter Kauf
Great communication. A pleasure to do business with, Firststop wholesale
good-items-japan (32990)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letzter Monat
Bestätigter Kauf
Good buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.(^^)
e-copart (17911)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letzter Monat
Bestätigter Kauf
Quick response and fast payment. Perfect! THANKS from ECOPART!!
a***q (2688)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letzter Monat
Bestätigter Kauf
Great seller. Very fast delivery. Thanks!!
studi888 (7634)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letzte 6 Monate
Bestätigter Kauf
Thank you for an easy, pleasant transaction. Excellent buyer. ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
c***n (9)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letzte 6 Monate
Bestätigter Kauf
Great eBayer. Communicated well. Thank you for the lens. It's exactly as described. Packaged securely.
Rezensionen (3)
16. Mai 2013
A handy compact zoom with super-fast accurate AF action.
2 von 2 finden das hilfreich I was looking for a tele zoom lens for my Sony Alpha-55 SLR. The usual option is to go for a 70-300, and Sony offer this lens in the range. However, the auto-focus action on the 70-300 is very hesitant and noisy, and you may well miss some action shots while the lens is hunting for focus, especially on a moving subject. Equally, the 70-300mm lens is quite long when zoomed fully telephoto, and it takes up quite a bit of bag room when travelling.
Enter the compact DT 55-200 SAM lens, which features Sony's built-in auto-focus servo motor for faster and more accurate auto-focus action. This lens is nicely balanced in terms of weight distribution, it's not much larger than the standard 'kit' 18-55 lens (and it takes the same 55mm screw-in filters), and the auto-focusing is quick and accurate even in low light when following a moving subject. Add to this Sony's patented "Steady Shot Inside" technology in the Alpha camera body and you have a compact and portable camera & lens combo with lots of extra "reach" for action shots under a wide range of conditions.
Okay, the reach is not as far as with the 70-300mm lens, but the camera's resolution and image quality are so high you can afford to crop the image a little afterwards to get the framing you wanted.
The DT in the name means this lens only fits APS-sensor cameras, so it won't work on the rarer full-frame Sony Alphas. SAL means it fits cameras with the Alpha/ Minolta AF mount, and SAM denotes the built-in AF motor which gives the super-fast auto-focus action. Beware, there is an earlier version of the 55-200 lens which doesn't say SAM on the barrel, and this lens relies on the camera's AF motor, so you don't get all the benefits of the SAM technology. This is why the lens I am reviewing has the product code SAL552002, there's a "2" on the end denoting the later model variant.
Overall I'm really pleased with the bargain lens I bought here, and I don't regret not going for the larger 70-300mm zoom at all.
Happy shooting!
Lens reviewed by wedge_pilot
22. Jul 2013
Crisp image quality, easy to use, but beware of wear in the plastic parts.
1 von 1 finden das hilfreich Sony have produced a surprisingly good range of cameras and lenses with the Alpha-SLT system. I'm a regular Nikon user, but I've been very agreeably surprised by the still and video picture quality from my Sony Alpha-55, and I was keen to see how a fast aperture prime lens would perform. I've already got the SAM F2.8 30mm Macro prime lens, which works very well indeed, but I wanted to experiment with the shallower depth of field which the F1.8 aperture has to offer, plus a lot more low-light capability than either my existing F2.8 Macro lens, or the F3.5 zoom lens as supplied with the camera kit . The first compromise is that a 50mm lens is not exactly a "standard" focal length with the alpha 55's APS-sized sensor, in fact it's equivalent to a 75mm portrait lens on 35mm film. Sony do offer a prime 35mm F1.8 lens in the same 'budget' range (this corresponds to approx. 52mm 'standard' lens on 35mm film cameras), but it's quite a bit more expensive than the 50mm F1.8 under review here, and I wanted to get the shallow depth of field look without spending too much. So, if you aren't planning to shoot too many room interiors or landscapes which need wide coverage, the 50mm F1.8 looks like the affordable choice. Sony also make a 50mm F1.4 lens, which is 'faster' due to offering a larger maximum aperture, and it offers even less depth of field than the 50mm F1.8. But this is a much more expensive lens (it's from an older Sony range which offers nice features like a solid metal rear lens mount) and more importantly the F1.4 lens doesn't have the SAM built-in auto-focus motor for lightning fast autofocus even in low light. The final other alternative fast prime lens for this camera would be a second-hand Minolta AF 50mm F1.7 lens which, like the Sony F1.4 lens, offers the more durable metal rear mount, but also doesn't not offer the built-in autofocus motor.
So having finally bought the Sony 50mm F1.8 SAM lens, what does it have to offer?
The SAM auto-focus motor gives very fast responding auto-focus action, and in conjunction with the selectable focus zones offered by my Alpha-55 it is able to find focus quickly on those parts of the image you want to focus on. When you switch to manual focus mode, the front mounted rubber focus ring gives smooth and accurate (if slightly noisy) adjustment of focus. All of my Sony Alpha lenses suffer from a noticeable mechanical whine when you turn the focus ring in manual mode, and this noise gets picked up by the on-camera microphone when shooting video. By contrast, my compact system camera is a Sony NEX-C3, and the e-fitting lenses for this little camera are silent in focusing.
The other disadvantage of this range is the use of plastic overall in the construction. The front filter thread is plastic, so you need to take care not to cross-thread when screwing filters into place. Worse still, the rear mounting flange on the lens is plastic, while most other lens ranges offer solid metal mount flanges. So check these areas out before buying a well-used example.
Finally, in use on my camera, it's a total win. Picture quality is excellent across the aperture range, with very good detail reproduction even into the image corners. The lens coating does a very good job of supressing flare, but you may need to use a lens hood when shooting into the light. Out-of focus areas blur very sweetly at wide apertures, giving the professional portrait 'look' I was after, and video focus pulls are easy to do. A great budget buy
17. Okt 2010
Canon G10 compact camera
For many years it has been an impossible dream to find a compact camera which will satisfy the seasoned SLR photographer. Back in 1990 some of the top camera brands (like Pentax, Olympus and Minolta)and a collection of new players including Ricoh, Samsung and Panasonic all launched compact 35mm film cameras with auto-focusing, built-in flash, power film advance and in many cases power zoom lenses. Almost without exception, these new generation cameras were overpriced, unreliable and produced disappointing results. So for photogaraphy enthusiasts, it was back to the bulky SLR kit, usually including camera body, short zoom lens, telephoto zoom lens and separate flash gun.
With the advent of digital cameras, there was at last a glimmer of hope. The new Sony Cybershot and Canon Ixus ranges of 2004/5 were neatly designed cameras which produced credibly good pictures for that early digital era. So at last the SLR kit could stay home sometimes. Until, maybe you wanted to take pictures in fading light, or you needed a separate flash unit to avoide red-eye or shoot at greater distances.
It was still the case that digital compact cameras had their limitations. Battery consumption was a big issue with AA-powered cameras, and this was made worse by prohibiting the manufacture of Nickel-Cadmium AA cells on environmetal grounds. The tiny 3x zoom lenses suffered from severe loss of light transmission at the far end of the zoom. The tiny built-in flash units always produced red-eye under normal shooting conditions. And even at the most often used wide-angle end of the zoom range, all was not well as most cameras produced poor barrel distortion which was really pronounced when copying artwork or shooting architectural features like window frames. And with a maximum ISO of 400, low-light shooting was restricted to tripod or flash. How many times have you seen that little white hand waving at you from the screen?
Fast forward to 2009 and the Canon G10. At last we have a superbly well engineered pro-compact camera which delivers all that it promises. The sleek black paint finish, those diamond-knurled controls on the top deck, the discreet engraved Canon logo, and that huge 3-inch screen which fills the rear panel.This little gem performs as well as it looks. I've used my Canon G10 for a few months now, and I have had nothing but pleasure and excellent images from it. The control layout is familiar and easy to use. Canon have kept the quadrant axis control by the rear screen for ready-access functions like flash control, macro and shutter release modes; and they have added the rotary dial navigation for manual control in camera mode, and image selection in playback mode-just like on their excellent EOS SLR range. For more ambitious shooting, you can use any of the Canon EX-range of separate flash units. I've got the compact 270-EX which is every bit as cute as the camera itself, and gives really professional-looking results. The camera is powered by a super high capacity Li-Ion battery which seems to hold its charge for ever, and that 3-inch screen gives superb visibility even in strong sunlight. Which brings me on to this camera's other USP, a working optical viewfinder. Yes, this is just about the only digital compact you can buy which has a look-though viewfinder! Have I convinced you that this camera is a revolutionary product as yet? Do bear in mind that I am in fact a life-long Nikon SLR user, and I have now bought my first Canon camera!Go get one