Info
Alle Bewertungen (152)
- folkartmama (4910)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzte 6 MonateBestätigter KaufSUPER buyer, always a pleasure selling to AWESOME customers, come back soon :)
- thesweetpot (328930)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letztes JahrBestätigter KaufGood buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
- l***s (192)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Vor über einem JahrBestätigter Kaufitem just as described, thanks!
- robotrave- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letztes JahrBestätigter KaufHope to deal with you again. Thank you.
- afyade (2149)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Vor über einem JahrBestätigter KaufGreat communication. A pleasure to do business with.
- ivy_touch (2317)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Vor über einem JahrBestätigter KaufHope to deal with you again. Thank you.
Rezensionen (1)
01. Dez 2020
A Good Watch But Looks Dated and Plot Needs Tidying Up
This adaptation of the book by James Elroy has a great cast and the plot is truthful to the book- which is also its problem. At times the story plays as confused and the denouement is preposterous and nonsensical. In addition, the book is a famous LA noir novel- so it contains messed-up characters, a twisting plot...and lots of LA. So, it's a pretty big dissapointment that LA doesn't appear in the film! It is shot almost entirely on set from the first scene and it is very obvious.
You could excuse this if it was made in 1982, which is exactly what it looks like. But it was made in 2006- thirteen years after Jurrassic Park and they can't show believale exterioir shots of LA from the time of the story. There is good cinematopgraphy on show but it is too dated looking.
This film is still enjoyable to watch and I recommend it if you have read the book. I came away wishing I could watch more, only done a bit better.