Info
Alle Bewertungen (543)
- toycameras (448)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzter MonatBestätigter KaufFast payment thank you, recommend. Thank you for your purchase.
- kidseedreams (3792)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzter MonatBestätigter KaufReturn customers are simply the best. Thank You for stopping back.
- sunshine9730 (163)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzter MonatBestätigter KaufGood Ebay purchaser.
- robertscamera (256880)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzte 6 MonateBestätigter KaufTHANK YOU! Enjoy your purchase from Roberts Camera!
- ecoflowdirect (22453)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzte 6 MonateBestätigter KaufThank you for an easy, pleasant transaction. Excellent buyer. A++++++.
- global-remote-store (50412)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzte 6 MonateBestätigter KaufGreat communication. A pleasure to do business with.
Rezensionen (5)
01. Jun 2010
Promaster/Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 non motor
It’s simply a great lens excellent for the price an exceptional value used. But it has its faults if you are a heavy user like me. It is not up to task of heavy daily use. However it is lighter, smaller and much cheaper than the Nikon version and just as sharp. I own or have owned two copies of this lens the original Tamron version and the second copy is the Promaster. Both are the original, older with no AF built in internal motor, non VC versions. This current Promaster copy I have now is even sharper then my first lens. The first one I had used on four different cameras over a 4 or 5 year period, a Fuji S2, D200, D2x and D300 and I basically completely wore it out. A rough usage estimate is somewhere in the 60,000 + capture range. It never me down though right up until the very end when it was due for great retirement center in the sky. I am a working pro and this lens is capable of consistent professional results under many different types of shoots. Just treat it well and keep in mind your trade off is ruggedness for cost, size and weight. If you are a light to moderate user and are not rough on your equipment like I am then you should consider this lens as a solid inexpensive choice. I have not tried the built in motor or VC versions of this lens. So I cannot speak to their quality so keep that in mind. Although I did decide to seek out the older version used rather then one of the current versions new after reading many reviews on line if that tells you anything.
01. Jun 2010
Promaster/Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 non motor
It’s simply a great lens excellent for the price an exceptional value used. But it has its faults if you are a heavy user like me. It is not up to task of heavy daily use. However it is lighter, smaller and much cheaper than the Nikon version and just as sharp. I own or have owned two copies of this lens the original Tamron version and the second copy is the Promaster. Both are the original, older with no AF built in internal motor, non VC versions. This current Promaster copy I have now is even sharper then my first lens. The first one I had used on four different cameras over a 4 or 5 year period, a Fuji S2, D200, D2x and D300 and I basically completely wore it out. A rough usage estimate is somewhere in the 60,000 + capture range. It never me down though right up until the very end when it was due for great retirement center in the sky. I am a working pro and this lens is capable of consistent professional results under many different types of shoots. Just treat it well and keep in mind your trade off is ruggedness for cost, size and weight. If you are a light to moderate user and are not rough on your equipment like I am then you should consider this lens as a solid inexpensive choice. I have not tried the built in motor or VC versions of this lens. So I cannot speak to their quality so keep that in mind. Although I did decide to seek out the older version used rather then one of the current versions new after reading many reviews on line if that tells you anything.
01. Jun 2010
Promaster/Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 non motor
It’s simply a great lens excellent for the price an exceptional value used. But it has its faults if you are a heavy user like me. It is not up to task of heavy daily use. However it is lighter, smaller and much cheaper than the Nikon version and just as sharp. I own or have owned two copies of this lens the original Tamron version and the second copy is the Promaster. Both are the original, older with no AF built in internal motor, non VC versions. This current Promaster copy I have now is even sharper then my first lens. The first one I had used on four different cameras over a 4 or 5 year period, a Fuji S2, D200, D2x and D300 and I basically completely wore it out. A rough usage estimate is somewhere in the 60,000 + capture range. It never me down though right up until the very end when it was due for great retirement center in the sky. I am a working pro and this lens is capable of consistent professional results under many different types of shoots. Just treat it well and keep in mind your trade off is ruggedness for cost, size and weight. If you are a light to moderate user and are not rough on your equipment like I am then you should consider this lens as a solid inexpensive choice. I have not tried the built in motor or VC versions of this lens. So I cannot speak to their quality so keep that in mind. Although I did decide to seek out the older version used rather then one of the current versions new after reading many reviews on line if that tells you anything.