Info
Alle Bewertungen (218)
- c***i- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letztes JahrBestätigter KaufGood seller! item as described.
- l***1 (2388)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letztes JahrBestätigter KaufItem just as described, well packaged and quickly shipped.
- 4***j (50)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letztes JahrBestätigter KaufGreat seller and smooth communication!
- theragingbull (2891)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzte 6 MonateBestätigter KaufExcellent buyer fast payment!!! Thanks!!!
- myfashiondiscountshop (6683)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzte 6 MonateBestätigter KaufQuick response and fast payment. Perfect! THANKS!!
- ufinds (506)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzte 6 MonateBestätigter KaufHope to deal with you again. Thank you.
Rezensionen (2)
01. Mai 2007
Rolleiflex 2.8 FX vs. 2.8 GX
1 von 1 finden das hilfreich I have own three Rolleiflex GX but only carefully examined Rolleifelx FX. The difference I see is that FX has exquisite exterior leathering and the originally-styled neckstrap. Other than that, GX and FX are identical in terms of their lenses, mechanic components, and funcationality. My GX's have produced great prints, no other twin-lens cameras can surppass. I started out with taking my kids' portraits and soon brought my GX to my field research in eastern Tibet (I'm an anthropologist). It has taken awe-inspiring ethnographic photos. GX makes me feel like an artist rather than a social scientist. What I don't like about GX (FX) is that it's a bit too light. It could be made heavier like how I feel about Leica M6. Currently GX is also over-priced. I'm sure I would not treat my GX as a collector's item sitting on shelf. I sold the Rollei 60th year commemorative version because it just looked too pretentious and gaudy, and it hindered my intent not to attract unnecceary attentions on the road. So, now I use a black GX made in the 1980s.
09. Aug 2018
Great book! Thanks, will buy again!
Great book! Thanks, will buy again!