Info
Alle Bewertungen (167)
- spkrparts!-2007 (74684)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Vor über einem JahrBestätigter KaufHope to deal with you again. Thank you.
- hippiechickherbalharmony (8)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzte 6 MonateBestätigter KaufGood buyer. No issues. Good communication.
- powerlink.infinity (165)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letzte 6 MonateBestätigter KaufPerfect transaction, thank you!
- partswiner (561)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letztes JahrBestätigter KaufThank you for an easy, pleasant transaction. Excellent buyer. A++++++.
- marchandthrift (686)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letztes JahrBestätigter KaufGreat buyer, quick and pleasant transaction!
- bigblueretro (1090)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Letztes JahrBestätigter KaufA+++++ buyer, quick payment, thank you
Rezensionen (8)
24. Mai 2017
Jewel of a cable
2 von 2 finden das hilfreich The are some professional reviews online to read so here is a simple layman's review. Put against two levels of cable, DH Labs Q10 Signatures and the Cardas Neutral Reference, Zu Libtec faces the challenge and lives to stay in my system. In my system, Nak PA5, Bryston B25, B&W 685 and PS Audio D3 DAC. Against the DH Labs, Zu produced tighter bass, greater depth and slightly more transparency. Instruments on classical music were better defined. Q10s were equal if not slightly better in exposing more information in the music without being too sterile. On jazz, the Q10s, one can here the shimmer on the cymbals and drums with greater definition and had a slightly longer decay. Against the Cardas, Libtec was more open overall. Cardas cable are known to lean towards the warm side, however slight in this case Libtec was bass tight here also but lacked the extension or weight of the Cardas. All else considered, it's a contender with other cables in it's original price class.
10. Mai 2017
Sounds good when usable
After some serious burn-in, these started to sound close to my Cardas Neutral Reference balanced IC. For my system, the Cardas provides more warmth and bass extension. Both cables have similar detail resolution and transparency with a slight edge to the Cardas in the scale of the soundstage. My system tends too be tighter in focus with most other cables that I've tried but the Cardas sets the limits beyond my speakers. The Mission Balanced ICs doesn't get it quite as big. What I'm amazed with is the clarity with these Missions. My system can be bright if the synergy isn't carefully crafted. The Missions are fairly neutral, more so than my Cardas. I would recommend the cables door any system since they don't add any coloration to the music at all. One problem, and a big one for me, these are a single factor finished cable that is split at the end. These won't work is you intend to connect it to a balanced amplifier. The connectors on the amp are too far apart. I contemplated ways to separate them but I really shouldn't have to do that. We're these designed to only bridge sources with a Pre? Use for home theater amps? Use with a balanced integrated? In any case, I'm not able to bridge my Amp so back to my Cardas. These will find a home in my second system between my DAC and Pre. This will give me a chance to A/B the cables against the DH Labs Air Matrix ICs.
17. Okt 2018
Good beginner intermediate
This is my first penhold paddle after using a handshake paddle for 2 years. I'm a casual player with intermediate skills. I modified both handles too be more ergonomic and found little performance difference so far, 3 weeks of play, between my Stiga Ultralight paddle. Top spins and back spins are the same, speed is the same if not slower with the Butterfly. I was hoping it would be night and day but it's not the case. My control isn't as accurate as with my Stiga. The advantage of the Stiga is it's weight. I can react slightly faster and feel like it's more of an extension of my arm rather than "swinging" a paddle. Still a very nice paddle compared to any recreational paddle.