Info
Alle Bewertungen (264)
ffors6 (4436)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letzte 6 Monate
Bestätigter Kauf
Fantastic
pixel.connection (9580)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letzte 6 Monate
Bestätigter Kauf
Quick response and fast payment. Perfect! THANKS!!
setuhatu1 (105)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letzte 6 Monate
Bestätigter Kauf
Great eBayer - thank you for your order!
matayo7 (297)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letzte 6 Monate
Bestätigter Kauf
Great! Thanks! A+ Ebayer
loveson (10639)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letztes Jahr
Bestätigter Kauf
Thank you for an easy, pleasant transaction. Excellent buyer! A++++++.
mapcamera (25267)- Bewertung vom Käufer.
Letztes Jahr
Bestätigter Kauf
Thank you for an easy, pleasant transaction. Excellent buyer. A++++++.
Rezensionen (5)
04. Jul 2018
Perfect!
Perfect fit for my Pelican 1500, with easily re-configured foam insert. Nice to have a hard shell that nests my cameras and lenses. Don't hesitate to buy if it meets your needs.
06. Mai 2012
Build quality, feel, and image quality are first rate.
1 von 2 finden das hilfreich I recently chose to sell all my Canon “landscape” lenses (zooms and primes to 105mm) and invest in Zeiss manual focus primes. This review considers the Zeiss Distagon T* 2/35 ZE which is an exceptional lens, in particular with increased detail at larger apertures. I chose to make a comparison between this lens (mounted on a Canon 1D Mk IV) and a Canon 50mm f1.8 (mounted on a Canon 5D Mk II). Both cameras were tripod mounted and placed virtually side-by-side. I chose a focus point approximately 12 feet from the camera position. When considering the sensor sizes, the two produced very similar fields of view. Though far from scientific, my observations of the resulting images are as follows. At f8, lens performance was similar, though the zone of acceptable focus was deeper with the Zeiss, most likely due to the wider aspect (35mm vs. 50mm). This continued through all other apertures, the Zeiss providing greater zone of acceptable focus than the Canon. In particular this is noticeable toward infinity, as details were much clearer going away from the focus point in each image. This test was performed outdoors, and breezy conditions undoubtedly effected the test with regard to sharpness with subject matter that was not stationary. However, objects like the satellite dish on a nearby house, or the mountain in the far background, or the identification label on a nearby telephone pole, all provided sharper results with the Zeiss at all apertures. I continue to use Canon telephoto lenses for wildlife imagery, and find the Canon 600mm f4L IS to be a remarkable tool. However, for landscape images, I believe the Zeiss lenses are clearly the better choice. Examples can be viewed at www.greatwestimages.com.
30. Jul 2018
Beware there blur!
Take this review with a grain of salt. I've only used the lens twice. I'm not saying this product is better than expected, as for me that's actually not the case. I believe the lens does what it purports to do; I'm just not wild about radial blur. I use the Velvet 85 and love it, love it, love it. I'll try the Sweet 50 a few more times, but I'm not certain it will get me where I'm going. Again, it's about the type of blur this lens employs, and perhaps I can learn how to use it so as to perform more like the Velvet 85 We shall see!