Bild 1 von 1

Standardbild

The Dynamics of Agricultural Insurance and Consumption Smoothing Gerald Nyambane - Bild 1 von 1

The Dynamics of Agricultural Insurance And Consumption Smoothing von Gerald Nyambane (2013, Taschenbuch)

buch-mimpf (20288)

100% positive Bewertungen

Preis:

€ 67,90

(inkl. MwSt.)

Kostenloser Versand

Lieferung ca. Di, 26. Aug - Sa, 30. Aug

Rücknahme:

1 Monat Rückgabe. Käufer zahlt Rückversand. Wenn Sie ein eBay-Versandetikett verwenden, werden die Kosten dafür von Ihrer Rückerstattung abgezogen. Für eBay Plus-Mitglieder ist der Rückversand im Inland kostenlos. Mehr erfahren.

Artikelzustand:

Neu

Titel: The Dynamics of Agricultural Insurance and Consumption Smoothing, Einband: Taschenbuch, Autor: Gerald Nyambane, Verlag: Scholars' Press, Sprache: Englisch, Seiten: 144, Maße: 220x150x9 mm, Gewicht: 233 g, Verkäufer: buch-mimpf.

Sammeln Sie 68 Punkte | Mehr erfahrenzu eBay Plus-Punkten - wird in neuem Fenster oder Tab geöffnet

Über dieses Produkt

Produktinformation

Most of the existing studies evaluating performance of market-based agricultural risk management instruments, are based on static, two-period models in which hedging or insurance is undertaken in the first period and all uncertainty is resolved in the second period. In reality, risk management decisions are undertaken in a multi-period, dynamic environment in which decisions in any period can affect outcomes in other periods. Once the modeling environment becomes truly dynamic, things can change substantially. This book focuses on interaction between farmer insurance decisions and their borrowing and saving decisions in a multi-period dynamic model. This type of interaction has not been comprehensively addressed in existing literature. In this book, a simple stochastic dynamic model is developed and solved for a risk-averse farmer using revenue insurance to manage risk and, also borrows and lends subject to a credit constraint. The analysis provides new insights into inter-temporal risk management behavior of farmers. It also suggests reasons why the effective demand for agricultural insurance may be much lower than that predicted by simple static models of agricultural insurance.