Bild 1 von 1
Galerie
Bild 1 von 1
Ungleichheit beurteilen: Oberste Gerichte des Staates und die Ungleichheitskrise -
US $20,00
Ca.EUR 17,20
oder Preisvorschlag
Artikelzustand:
Neuwertig
Buch, das wie neu aussieht, aber bereits gelesen wurde. Der Einband weist keine sichtbaren Gebrauchsspuren auf. Bei gebundenen Büchern ist der Schutzumschlag vorhanden (sofern zutreffend). Alle Seiten sind vollständig vorhanden, es gibt keine zerknitterten oder eingerissenen Seiten und im Text oder im Randbereich wurden keine Unterstreichungen, Markierungen oder Notizen vorgenommen. Der Inneneinband kann minimale Gebrauchsspuren aufweisen. Minimale Gebrauchsspuren. Genauere Einzelheiten sowie eine Beschreibung eventueller Mängel entnehmen Sie bitte dem Angebot des Verkäufers.
- Sofort-KaufenUngleichheit beurteilen: Oberste Gerichte des Staates und die Ungleichheitskrise
Oops! Looks like we're having trouble connecting to our server.
Refresh your browser window to try again.
Versand:
US $15,94 (ca. EUR 13,71) UPS Ground Saver.
Standort: Taylorsville, Kentucky, USA
Lieferung:
Lieferung zwischen Mi, 15. Okt und Di, 21. Okt nach 94104 bei heutigem Zahlungseingang
Rücknahme:
Keine Rücknahme.
Zahlungen:
Sicher einkaufen
- Gratis Rückversand im Inland
- Punkte für jeden Kauf und Verkauf
- Exklusive Plus-Deals
Der Verkäufer ist für dieses Angebot verantwortlich.
eBay-Artikelnr.:376489472025
Artikelmerkmale
- Artikelzustand
- ISBN
- 9780871545039
Über dieses Produkt
Product Identifiers
Publisher
Russell Sage Foundation
ISBN-10
0871545039
ISBN-13
9780871545039
eBay Product ID (ePID)
27050076408
Product Key Features
Number of Pages
378 Pages
Publication Name
Judging Inequality : State Supreme Courts and the Inequality Crisis
Language
English
Subject
American Government / Judicial Branch, American Government / Legislative Branch, General
Publication Year
2021
Type
Textbook
Subject Area
Law, Political Science
Format
Trade Paperback
Dimensions
Item Height
1.3 in
Item Length
9 in
Item Width
6 in
Additional Product Features
Intended Audience
College Audience
LCCN
2021-000142
Reviews
" Judging Inequality is an extraordinary achievement. In this empirical tour de force of exceptional transparency using massive new data sets, Gibson and Nelson have produced a seminal and indispensable work on state supreme courts replete with nuanced, compelling, and sometimes surprising results. Bravo!" -- Melinda Gann Hall, Professor of Political Science, MSU Distinguished Faculty Award Winner, and College of Law Faculty Affiliate, Michigan State University, "For too long, political scientists have paid little attention to the state courts relative to their importance in U.S. politics and policy. This pathbreaking book and data by James Gibson and Michael Nelson should ignite such attention. In Judging Inequality , the authors analyze six thousand cases to present compelling evidence on how judicial institutions and judges' backgrounds shape inequality in the United States today." -- Brandice Canes-Wrone, Donald E. Stokes Professor of Public and International Affairs and Professor of Politics, Princeton University, " Judging Inequality is an extraordinary achievement. In this empirical tour de force of exceptional transparency using massive new data sets, Gibson and Nelson have produced a seminal and indispensable work on state supreme courts replete with nuanced, compelling, and sometimes surprising results. Bravo!" -- Melinda Gann Hall, Professor of Political Science, MSU Distinguished Faculty Award Winner, and College of Law Faculty Affiliate, Michigan State University "For too long, political scientists have paid little attention to the state courts relative to their importance in U.S. politics and policy. This pathbreaking book and data by James Gibson and Michael Nelson should ignite such attention. In Judging Inequality , the authors analyze six thousand cases to present compelling evidence on how judicial institutions and judges' backgrounds shape inequality in the United States today." -- Brandice Canes-Wrone, Donald E. Stokes Professor of Public and International Affairs and Professor of Politics, Princeton University "A pathbreaking, first-of-its-kind study of how U.S. state law and courts--purportedly closer to the people themselves than the U.S. Supreme Court--effectively shield powerful economic interests from popular calls for equality and redistribution, Judging Inequality is an exemplary work of social science. James L. Gibson and Michael J. Nelson's masterful yet sobering account is a must-read for anyone who harbors hopes for addressing inequality challenges that have plagued American society for generations through strategic litigation at the state court level." -- Ran Hirschl, Professor of Government and Earl E. Sheffield Regents Chair in Law, University of Texas at Austin, "A pathbreaking, first-of-its-kind study of how U.S. state law and courts--purportedly closer to the people themselves than the U.S. Supreme Court--effectively shield powerful economic interests from popular calls for equality and redistribution, Judging Inequality is an exemplary work of social science. James L. Gibson and Michael J. Nelson's masterful yet sobering account is a must-read for anyone who harbors hopes for addressing inequality challenges that have plagued American society for generations through strategic litigation at the state court level." -- Ran Hirschl, Professor of Government and Earl E. Sheffield Regents Chair in Law, University of Texas at Austin
Dewey Edition
23
Grade From
College Freshman
Illustrated
Yes
Dewey Decimal
342.7308/5
Table Of Content
Contents List of Illustrations About the Authors Preface and Acknowledgments Chapter 1. The Role of State Supreme Courts in Creating Public Policies That Affect Political, Legal, Economic, and Social Inequality Chapter 2. The Political, Legal, Economic, and Social Inequality State Supreme Court Database Chapter 3. Do the Haves Come Out Ahead in the State High Courts? Chapter 4. The Backgrounds and Ideologies of State Supreme Court Justices Chapter 5. The Institutions Chapter 6. The Capture of State Supreme Courts by State Political Regimes Chapter 7. Accounting for the Voting Behavior of State Supreme Court Justices on Cases Pertinent to Inequality Chapter 8. When Do Courts Advance Equality? Chapter 9. State Supreme Courts and Political, Legal, Economic, and Social Inequality Notes References Index
Synopsis
Social scientists have convincingly documented soaring levels of political, legal, economic, and social inequality in the United States. Missing from this picture of rampant inequality, however, is any attention to the significant role of state law and courts in establishing policies that either ameliorate or exacerbate inequality. In Judging Inequality , political scientists James L. Gibson and Michael J. Nelson demonstrate the influential role of the fifty state supreme courts in shaping the widespread inequalities that define America today, focusing on court-made public policy on issues ranging from educational equity and adequacy to LGBT rights to access to justice to worker's rights. Drawing on an analysis of an original database of nearly 6,000 decisions made by over 900 judges on 50 state supreme courts over a quarter century, Judging Inequality documents two ways that state high courts have crafted policies relevant to inequality: through substantive policy decisions that fail to advance equality and by rulings favoring more privileged litigants (typically known as "upperdogs"). The authors discover that whether court-sanctioned policies lead to greater or lesser inequality depends on the ideologies of the justices serving on these high benches, the policy preferences of their constituents (the people of their state), and the institutional structures that determine who becomes a judge as well as who decides whether those individuals remain in office. Gibson and Nelson decisively reject the conventional theory that state supreme courts tend to protect underdog litigants from the wrath of majorities. Instead, the authors demonstrate that the ideological compositions of state supreme courts most often mirror the dominant political coalition in their state at a given point in time. As a result, state supreme courts are unlikely to stand as an independent force against the rise of inequality in the United States, instead making decisions compatible with the preferences of political elites already in power. At least at the state high court level, the myth of judicial independence truly is a myth. Judging Inequality offers a comprehensive examination of the powerful role that state supreme courts play in shaping public policies pertinent to inequality. This volume is a landmark contribution to scholarly work on the intersection of American jurisprudence and inequality, one that essentially rewrites the "conventional wisdom" on the role of courts in America's democracy.
LC Classification Number
KF4764
Artikelbeschreibung des Verkäufers
Info zu diesem Verkäufer
dyltip-0
100% positive Bewertungen•60 Artikel verkauft
Angemeldet als privater VerkäuferDaher finden verbraucherschützende Vorschriften, die sich aus dem EU-Verbraucherrecht ergeben, keine Anwendung. Der eBay-Käuferschutz gilt dennoch für die meisten Käufe. Mehr erfahrenMehr erfahren
Verkäuferbewertungen (11)
- 2***s (324)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Vor über einem JahrBestätigter KaufFast shipping and good products. Couldn't ask for a better transaction than this. Thank you!Tillman 6201 9 oz FR Cotton Protective Welding Sleeves W/ Elastic Wrist/Top 1 PR (Nr. 375330515279)
- 9***8 (1803)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Vor über einem JahrBestätigter KaufProblem with shipping but refunded good sellerApple MacBook Pro 13 inch **EMPTY BOX ONLY** (Nr. 375397882366)
- 7***4 (765)- Bewertung vom Käufer.Vor über einem JahrBestätigter KaufNice just as describedTillman 6201 9 oz FR Cotton Protective Welding Sleeves W/ Elastic Wrist/Top 1 PR (Nr. 375330515279)